eSchool News published an article last year titled "Survey shows barriers to Web 2.0 in schools" and while the article is already a year old and its reported statistics may have changed, I agree with what it states. I, for example, am trying a lot of Web 2.0 tools in my own classroom this year, and my use of them drives whether or not my school lets those particular tools through our local firewall. However, I am not using many social networking tools in the classroom, partly because I'm not sure what educational purpose they would serve, but also because the term "social networking" automatically brings to mind sites like FaceBook and MySpace which would be remarkably distracting in a classroom setting.
Just this past week at the 2010 TCEA conference, I happened to meet the two owners of a new business that provided a social networking platform designed for the classroom,
EduModo. I believe that EduModo is doing what it takes to ensure teachers that this particular website would be safe for classroom use and could separate students' and teachers' personal lives from their professional ones, but I am still not sure about just how educational this tool could be. I am still thinking about this and may give it a try later.
The article lists the top three reasons for why school districts may elect to use Web 2.0 in school and I agree with them, but I also would add one more, and that is that I need any tool I use to be useful in getting the desired scores from my students on our high stakes, state standardized test. This reason alone is sometimes enough for me to rule out a particular Web 2.0 tool or decide to use it.
I totally agree that teachers are beginning to start teaching the way that students think now, and Web 2.0 tools are exactly that. They most often can be personalized to fit and express an individual's style and preferences, can be shared easily, and are instantly gratifying. The question that we are all experimenting with in our minds, I suppose, is: does teaching in this manner truly cause the student to learn more? Or will instant gratification and flashy graphics distract from what the student might not be learning at all?
I don't know the answer to that yet (although I will find out when this year's TAKS test rolls around). But I can't help but think that the move toward making more creative learners and thinkers can't be a bad thing.